• Subscription Plans Available – One Time Payment Only

    PayPal and All Major Credit/Debit Cards Accepted
    PayPal Logo

2016 Market & Volatility Expectations – Daily Options Trading Strategy (DOTS)

I am expecting the markets to have a down year overall, with a lot of volatility daily. When using the Daily Options Trading Strategy (DOTS), I actually prefer this, as it tends to bring a lot more daily trades. I especially prefer when the markets open down, as there will always be more call buying opportunities, and the DOTS strategy does have more call trades than put trades on a percentage basis. This type of market volatility also brings increased sell-to-close (STC) orders. The DOTS strategy is unique in the sense that its performance is not based on how the markets overall are trading. It spots daily lows and highs extremely well. The key to the strategy is patience and not having a trigger-finger. However, when the 4 bottom indicator numbers and Bollinger Bands are all aligned for a trade, it must be made.

A few stocks on the DOTS list I like to move up this year are: FitBit (FIT), Twitter (TWTR, see a buyout possibility), and Alibaba (BABA).

For those unfamiliar with my subscription service, my daily Skype/Chatzy part of the subscription provides, in real-time, the DOTS trades I make. Before each trade, I provide the ticker symbol I am watching for a possible trade. This is when the Bollinger Bands start to expand and the indicator numbers are getting closer to a buy point. Once a trade is near, I once again provide the ticker symbol, the strike price, expiration date, my sell-to-close order (above the price paid per contract). Once an order is filled, the group chat and I provide what they paid per contract.

I also take questions all day from my subscribers via the mainchat or through personal Instant Messaging on Skype. It is very community-based.

The subscription also includes access to my Trading Forum, where I post my earnings trades, weekly trades, and long-term trades. These are great sources for added income.

All subscription plans come with a one week, money back guarantee if you are not happy with the service, no questions asked. If you have any questions, you can e-mail me at: kmob79@gmail.com.

Thanks, and Happy New Year.


Great Start to the Week, Notes, Info – 12/28/15

We have had two very good Daily Options Trading Strategy (DOTS) trades today. (NFLX) at 10:13 am EST, $0.35 sell to close order above price paid (paid $4.70, sold at $5.05), and (GOOGL) at 11:01 am EST, $1.00 sell to close order above price paid (groupchat paid an average of $14.70, sold at $15.70. GOOGL took off right after being placed.

Many of the DOTS trades trades actually go for a much higher sell to close price daily if held longer, but I am more interested in making a very nice profit fast, and move on to the next trade. In and out. For example, the GOOGL trade today netted a 6.8 % ROI, but could have been sold much higher if held even 20 minutes longer. But the goal of the strategy is to exit as fast as possible and to not be greedy.

Stocks like (TWTR) tend to average at least a 10% per DOTS trade. This is because on average, a TWTR call or put option is less than $2.00 per contract, and I use minimum $0.20 order above the price paid per contract. However, the higher priced stocks, like (NFLX),(GOOGL), (TSLA), (AMZN), (BIDU), etc, have higher sell to close orders, and tend to close out a lot faster than lower-priced stocks, but not always.

The STC prices I use are based on numerous factors:

– The stocks share price
– The volatility of the stock itself
– Option liquidity (daily)
– Time of day the trade is placed (i.e. I will use a higher STC earlier in the day and a lower STC after 1:00 pm EST)

You can see my daily trade log at: http://kevinmobrien.com/?page_id=480

My subscription-based service provides all of these trades in real-time, with the ticker symbol, strike price, my sell-to close orders used (before the trade is even placed), and when the trade is closed out.

If you have any questions about the strategy, subscription plan, or about stock options, you can e-mail me at: kmob79@gmail.com or info@kevinmobrien.com

Earnings Trade of the Week: Red Hat, Inc. (RHT) – Earnings Trade – Reports After the Markets Close 12/17/15

Red Hat, Inc. (RHT) is scheduled to report earnings after the markets close on Thursday, December 17, 2015.

(RHT) price movement after reporting earnings has been unpredictable at times. Last quarter, the stock didn’t move too much at all, as this shows:

Sep 22, 2015


Sep 21, 2015


On the other hand, I have used Strangles on (RHT) many times before and have done extremely well. On specific stocks over the years, I have placed this strategy I will be using here. It is a Neutral Calendar Spread in combination with a Strangle that uses deep-out-of-the money calls and puts, along with at least month out expirations. The premise of the strategy is to immediately profit off the Neutral Calendar Spread, which in this case expires tomorrow, 12/18/15. The Strangle side can be looked at as a safety net and a potential big winner in the event the stock does make one its large price moves. Since this specific Neutral Calendar Spread trade allows plenty of price movement anyway at a great price, even if the stock make a big move, there is a good chance both sides will profit at some point.

To explain this strategy and how I expect to profit, look at it this way: Let’s assume that tomorrow pre-market, (RHT) isn’t doing much in terms of price movement. Maybe up or down $2.50 a share. This would be great, as the Neutral Calendar Spread would profit immediately (even quicker than usual since it’s expiring tomorrow). But what about the Strangle side, and how would that do? Since the price paid for the Strangle in this case is so minimal, the gains made by the Neutral Calendar Spread would more than wipe out any loss by either side of the Strangle. However, since the Strangle still has a month of time-value left on a volatile stock such as (RHT), it will still hold value quite well.

In the event that (RHT) makes a huge move, up or down, well, this would be even better, actually. Since the Strangle has that time-value, and the Strangle has unlimited profit on the call side, this would make even more than the NCS strategy. The same is similar with the put side on teh Strangle, only that a stock can only drop to zero. If the stock does make a large move, I will simply close out the Neutral Calendar Spread tomorrow before the markets close, probably fairly early in the day, just to close it out.

This is a unique options strategy, but you do have to very selective in which stocks to use this strategy with for an earnings trade.

Depending on your trading platform, you may have to enter each strategy separately. Most platforms will allow you to place it as one order. For simplification purposes, I will post each strategy and post what limit order should be placed for each, and as a whole.

Here is how the trade is placed:

Entered Trade: The Neutral Calendar Spread Side of the Trade (1)

Sell -10 RHT Dec15 77.5 Call

Buy 10 RHT Jan16 77.5 Call


Option Requirement
Total Requirements
Estimated Commission

NBBO 0.50 – 0.95. Try to pay 0.75 or less for this side of the trade.

Entered Trade # 2: The Strangle Side

Buy 10 RHT Jan16 90 Call

Buy 10 RHT Jan16 65 Put


Option Requirement
Total Requirements
Estimated Commission

NBBO 0.60 – 1.20. Try to pay 0.90 or less for this side of the trade. At a maximum, pay up to 0.95.

Entered Trade as One Order

Sell -10 RHT Dec15 77.5 Call

Buy 10 RHT Jan16 77.5 Call

Buy 10 RHT Jan16 90 Call

Buy 10 RHT Jan16 65 Put


Option Requirement
Total Requirements
Estimated Commission

1.20 – 2.25. Try to pay 1.70 or less for this trade. At a maximum, pay up to 1.75 for the entire order.

I will post the price to close the orders out tomorrow pre-market.

Update 1: 9:21 am EST: Pre-market, the stock is up around $6.00 a share. This is what I expected. On the NCS side of the trade, place the STC at 1.40. On the Strangle call side, this has some serious upside now, place the STC at $4.00. Leave the put side open for now. I’ll update this later.

Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. (GMCR) Sold to Private Equity Firm

Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. (GMCR) has been bought out by a private equity firm for $13.9 billion. In October, I placed and posted a long-term trade on (GMCR), seeing it as extremely undervalued. I have posted a screenshot of that trade below, along with the news of the buyout…

GMCR 12715


Removing SanDisk (SNDK) From the Daily Options Trading Strategy – 10/22/15 – Adding Monster Beverage (MNST)

With Western Digital buying SanDisk (SNDK), I am removing the stock from the daily strategy. I am replacing SanDisk with Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST).

Here the new updated Daily Options Trading Strategy list as of 10/22/15:





Weekly Trades and Strategies That Require Less Time Management – 9/17/15

For traders that are busy and do not have time to trade daily, I also have weekly trades such as the Reverse Iron Condor and Neutral Calendar Spreads. These  trades are very easy to manage and do not require constant monitoring. I post these trades usually on Thursday mornings before noon EST in the Trading Forum at http://kevinmobrien.com/forum/index.php. The Reverse Iron Condors have an expiration the following Friday using weekly options. For example, today I placed a Reverse Iron Condor on Citigroup (C) and the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), and they expire on 9/25/15. Usually, they take about 3 trading days to close the position, sometimes a day sooner or later. I post updates on the sell-to-close orders as the positions begin to move. These trades are very inexpensive to place, and consistently provide a great source of profits on a yearly basis. I have many articles on Seeking Alpha on these strategies if you would like to learn more about them.

Other weekly Reverse Iron Condor candidates are iShares Silver Trust (SLV) and the (VXX).

If you have a busy schedule, definitely check these strategies out.

Earnings Strategy: The Strangle

The Strangle is a strategy that, when used properly, can bring very high returns. Similar to the Straddle, the Strangle is when a trader buys both out-of-the-money call and put options, anticipating a large price move after the company reports earnings. It is a neutral-based strategy, meaning that it doesn’t matter which way the stock moves, as long as it does move. Profit potential is unlimited on the upside and at full profit if the stock hits rock bottom on the put side. The strategy is a debit spread. I prefer to only use this strategy on stocks that historically and consistently make very large price moves after reporting earnings.

While the returns can be very high, this is a strategy that is not very cheap to place, although lower than the Straddle. There are numerous factors that are keys to success using this strategy:

  • The stocks volatility after reporting earnings (Historical and Implied Volatility)
  • The price paid to place the trade
  • The Strike Prices used and Strike Price Increments
  • Time-Decay and Time-Value
  • Liquidity
  • Lower Share Priced Stocks
  • Time of Placement

Deciding which stocks are good candidates for a Strangle can be difficult sometimes. Just because a stock moved 15% last quarter after reporting earnings doesn’t mean the same will happen the next time, and vice versa. This is why I only recommend using this strategy only with stocks you follow daily and understand how they move both pre-earnings and post-earnings. My advice to new traders to this strategy is to look at a minimum of the last four quarters to see how the stock has moved in terms of percentage post-earnings.

The Strangle is not a strategy to use with stocks that historically move little post-earnings. An example of this would be a stock like AT&T (T). You don’t want to use a Strangle on a stock that might move only $1.00 a share after reporting earnings. You will have no chance to make any money. On the other hand, stocks like TSLA, GOOGL, SNDK, YELP, and pharmaceutical companies are good candidates (I will use this strategy on pharmaceutical companies when the FDA ishttp://kevinmobrien.com/wp-admin/post-new.php set to make a decision on drug approval/denial). BETA can also be a good gauge on how a stock may move. Even with this information, repetition and practice will be your best way to learn this strategy and when to pick your spots.

The price paid to place this trade is critical to the Strangle strategy. Often, some trades are just too expensive. This is due usually to the rise in Implied Volatility and expected price movement. Some time ago, there was an author on Seeking Alpha who recommended a Strangle on Priceline (PCLN). I knew ahead of time this was going to be a disaster of a trade. First, the options were simply too expensive. Even on a Strangle, which cost less than the Straddle, this trade was going for over $35.00 a contract on each side of the trade, the calls and puts. To add to the disaster, the author was using expiration dates that expired that same week. To explain this, if the stock didn’t move about $80.00/share, it was a loser. What I though might happen did, PCLN moved minimally. Those calls and puts both got crushed. A huge loss, but even more so because there was no time left at all for it to even move towards one of the strikes. So how does one tell if an option is overpriced? Implied Volatility (IV) is a good start, but hardly all that matters. Current market conditions, the 52-week range of the stock, historical volatility, all play a role, as does time-value.

Let’s say I wanted to use a Strangle on TSLA, with October expirations and buying $260.00 calls and $245.00 puts. The trade is going for (hypothetically) $30.00 ($15.00 for each “leg”) combined to place. This would immediately give me some hesitation, even with the time-value factor on my side. The reason is the IV crush would still severely drop the value of both the calls and puts. It would take a fairly massive move after earnings to just break-even. While this is definitely possible with a stock such as TSLA, if I am paying that much to place the trade, I better be very sure it will move like that. Anything less and the trade will lose a lot of value. However, if I saw that the trade was going for $20.00 – $22.00 to place, I would be more inclined to buy a Strangle. Understanding these subtle differences will come with experience.

The strike prices chosen is very important when placing a Strangle. You do not want to use too far out-of-the-money calls and puts. The stock could make a large price move after reporting, but if you used strikes way out there it is basically buying a lottery ticket. While the cost of the trade can be substantially reduced by doing this, it also makes it more difficult to profit, as the deltas are much lower. Market makers understand this, as well. The strike prices used also must be realistic compared to what the share price currently is and what the reasonable, expected movement might be after reporting earnings. On a stock such as GOOGL, for example, if the share price is at $650.00/share currently, I do not want to be using $800.00 calls and $500.00 puts. That is much too wide apart. A more realistic Strangle would be $700.00 calls and $600.00 puts, with longer expirations, which I will go into.

Strike price increments available is something to pay very close attention to. On higher-priced stocks like GOOGL, PCLN, etc., the strike prices are in $5.00 increments. As an example, October (calls) $650.00, $655.00, $660.00/ (puts) $645.00, $640.00, $635.00. This is not such a big issue with these higher-priced stocks, but with lower-priced stocks this is a major problem. There are times where I really like the price of a specific trade, but the strike price increments available make it impossible to trade. A stock such as Boeing (BA), at $135.00/share currently, only has strike price increments of $5.00 if using month out options. Knowing how BA tends to move after reporting earnings historically, I would never use a Strangle on BA with only those strike prices, It would take too much of a move up or down to break-even, let alone profit.

Time-Decay is one aspect of this strategy that I really stress option traders to learn. Time-Value is even more important. I would never recommend for any trader to use weekly options or soon-to-be expiring options. The reason for this is the time-decay factor. After earnings are announced, the Implied Volatility drop will always be significant. This is why you will sometimes see a stock move exactly as you hoped for post-earnings release, but the option value remains stagnant or loses value. I get asked this question all the time. Often, it was because the trader used weekly options. This is even more pronounced with the Strangle, as you are initially buying out-of-the-money options. The Straddle will have a higher delta as it is more deep-in-the-money (as compared to the Strangle). My advice: never use weekly or short-term expiring options when placing a Strangle. I recommend at least three (3) weeks of time-value. This also protects you in case the stock initially does not make the required move. If you have weekly options, you aren’t even giving the stock a chance to do so. While you will pay more for the added time-value, it is well worth it. The cost is higher, but it is a nice safety net, and the longer-term options will hold their value much better.

Always pay attention to liquidity when placing a Strangle, both the open interest, daily, and the stock itself. A great example of this is a stock like Autozone (AZO) and  Intuitive Surgical (ISRG). What happens here is that the bid/ask prices are so wide on the options post earnings that even if the stock required the necessary price move to profit, you may not make what you thought you would. Often, you will not get your sell-to-close order filled at the mid-point of the bid/ask, which should be the reasonable price to close out the profitable side. Depending on the liquidity, there just may not be enough buyers willing to pay that., so the trade could sit in the queue for hours, if not days to get your desired price. I’ve seen this happen all too often. The last thing you want to see if a great trade go bad and the stock reverse itself. That’s not fun to watch.

With stocks that have a lower share price, you really have to be careful using a Strangle strategy. This is because the stock will not move as much incrementally as a stock that is higher priced, and the strike prices available may hinder any profitability. For example, if a stock is currently $20.00/share, but there are only $2.50 strike price increments available, it makes it very difficult to profit. There are exceptions to this rule, but generally, try to use stocks that are at least $50.00 a share or higher. I recommend completely staying away from stocks that are under $15.00/share.

The Strangle is very reliant on where the current share price is and when you place the trade. The goal here is to use strike price increments that are as close to neutral as possible. Placing a Strangle too early can have serious consequences. As an example, let’s say I bought a Strangle on XYZ stock at the market open when it was $100.00/share.The company is expected to announce earnings after the bell that same day. Since everyone knows this, the volume will be higher and the share price will fluctuate. By 2:00 p.m. EST that same day, the share price is now $105.00. Well, now my Strangle trade is no longer neutral-based at all. It is completely bullish to the call side. If the call side is up (which it would be under this circumstance), the put side will be down a lot, as well. Yes, you could ride it out and keep both sides, but defeats the purpose of the strategy to begin with. There is just a likelihood that the stock moves back down after-hours and into the next day that you are stuck right in the middle, which is the worst possible scenario when using a Strangle.

What I like to do is this: if  a company is reporting earnings before the markets open the following day, I will place the Strangle anywhere from 2:00 pm EST- to 3:00 pm EST the day before. This allows me to have a good idea where the share price will close at and what strike prices to use to be as neutral as possible. You do not want uneven strike prices. It doesn’t have to be aligned perfectly, but as even as possible.

To summarize, while the Strangle strategy can be used to great effect, a trader must be very careful when using it. It is one of the more expensive earnings trades  and while it can provide great returns when right, the losses can be very large if the stock does not move as necessary. It is a strategy that becomes more easy to understand and use properly with experience. Make sure to only use this strategy with stocks you are familiar with, and pay extra for the added time-value.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment or e-mail me at kmob79@gmail.com. Thanks.














  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 120 other subscribers

  • Recommended Books on Amazon.com